Ulysses free download mac

Ulysses is an intuitive and powerful application that offers a professional writing environment for authors. This program provides faultless sync, flexible export, and effective document management tools to make writers more productive. It offers a highly optimized interface with self-explaining tools and options to enhance your workflow.

The program provides a markup-based and distraction-free editor that helps you focus on your tasks. It makes it possible for you to write, edit, and create documents in an elegant way that was not experienced before. Moreover, it enables you to manage projects of all kinds and sizes such as fiction, nonfiction, diaries, study notes, and more. It allows you to export files in HTML code with a variety of formatting styles.

Ulysses supports you whenever it comes to publish your content to WordPress, Ghost, and Medium with categories, images, tags, and more. It allows you to view content before publishing it on the internet. On a short note, Ulysses is a tremendous application for writing purposes.

Click on the button given below to download Ulysses 22 free setup. It is a complete offline setup of Ulysses 22 for macOS with a single click download link. We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences and repeat visits. However, you may visit "Cookie Settings" to provide a controlled consent.

Cookie Settings Accept All. Thanks a lot! I use Ulysses for writing ficiton. I was a Scrivener user for years. It's a powerful program that reminds me in some ways of Photoshop - incredibly powerful yet complex in ways I often never get around to using.

This is where Scrivener falls apart - their iPad app is a different program, and syncing across multiple devices requires third party programs and platforms I can write anywhere, anytime.

My other favorite feature is being able to write in Markdown -- so with two keyboard clicks, I can leave inline notes to myself within the text that do not export to the finished document and don't exist in a sidebar. The simplicity of the design in relationship to the variety of function is great. Two feature requests - I still use Pacemaker for project wordcount setting and goal keeping.

I'd love it if Ulysses' in app goal setting features were so robust. Apps with non-standard UIs and I just don't tend to get along.

I use most apps in fits and starts, and that's certainly true of Ulysses. If I wrote for a living, or maybe even if I journaled every day, it'd be different - I'd be using the app pretty much daily and wouldn't have a chance to forget all its peculiarities. But I don't write every day; I write when I feel inspired to, and that might be every day for three days in a row or for a week, and then I won't feel the need to write again for a month, and therein lies the problem with apps with non-standard UIs: when I launch an app with a non-standard UI after that month of not using it, I've completely forgotten how it works and I need to go through a tutorial all over again if I want to use it.

Which is not something I'm willing to do for any app that's not essential to my life. And for me personally, the value of a pretty UI and having no visual distractions while writing is nowhere near so great that I would think it worth my while to re-school myself on how to use Ulysses all over again every time I forget.

The whole idea behind the Mac is that computing should be intuitive, and Ulysses is not. So I'm most likely done with it and will be going back to Word or some other app that I know how to operate when I open it, no matter how long it's been since I last used it.

Here's a splendid tool that every writer should have, a versatile engine that is devoted to nothing less than prose itself, and while it can do much more, its entire point is as simple as that, becasue as the old saying goes, writers write -- and it's really the only pedigreee any writer needs, because if you're writing, you're a writer, and if you're not, you aren't.

Ulysses takes its name from what happens to be my favorite poem, an heroic epic from no less than Tennyson almighty, who like all writers knew the agony of an art that begins with nothing, but by som curious alchemy offers outcomes our world simply could not be without. We writers are as Tennyson penned, "one equal temper of heroic hearts, made weak by time and fate but strong in will to strive, to seek, to find and not to yield.

Apart from the Goal-setting feature, which is really good, I can't think of anything that Nisus doesn't allow you to do much better.

In Nisus you can instantly create markup tags. I even tweaked the interface and the styles to give me a certain Ulysses feeling in Nisus. If you assign Heading 7 to the "Normal" style in Nisus, all your text will be accessible in Nisus' Navigator, from where you can instantly restructure the whole document by dragging portions of the text up and down in the Navigator, like you can do with sheets in Ulysses. Ulysses also can't assign language property to text like Nisus can do.

Therefore there's no way, for example, to find all French words and phrases in your document. Ulysses doesn't have tables, does it? I searched for the word "table" in the introduction and found "comforTABLE", which then reminded me that you can only search for strings, not words. Enough said. Based on the following criteria, I give Ulysses 2. Sonnendeck Aug 11 Forget it!!

To the trash At this rate this will be a painful for many people. Jimk Aug 11 Five stars for the app, four stars removed for the surprise licensing change which I found out about from 9to5 Mac, and not from the Soulmen themselves. It is a good app, but the subscription model is not justified for a text editor.

Ptk3 May 11 I just spent two months with Ulysses writing a chapter for a collective book; the tool is great; very hepful in focusing on your writing and managing notes from lot of sources. Just near perfect to manage markdown markup. Interface is good, really good a thought for the really beautiful interface of Write, which its dev nearly abandoned , and the ability to merge two files seems to be great I've not tested it this time… it feels risky for a production work, but I ahve to try it on some drafts.

There's just two or three features I'd like to see implemented to make it the best tool for writing in markdown AND long texts: 1 folding text really, really needed , as it becomes really annoying to scroll in a text of 20 pages or more, 2 export better, of course for Word as we have lots of collegues, editors, and other peopla around in our profesionnal world who work with that… soft : converting to word means converting all the markdown, footnote, table, img… 3 synchronisation between the macOS and the iOS version works good, but not very good folders seems to take more time than files to be sync when you change their name or replace them.

Finally the learning curve is not so trivial; it could be good to add in-app tutorial when it csynchronisation between the macOS and the iOS version works good, but not very good folders seems to take more time than files to be sync when you change their name or replace them.

It's a beautiful peace of software, and I really thank the Soulmen for maling it possible… Go on bro'! Teksestro Apr 8 This is not a serious writing tool - it's a glorified note-taking app. Commercial writers tend to work in multiple projects, for multiple clients. Shoving all my writing into one big database is a joke. Unless the developers can make this fundamental change to the app, nothing else matters.

I really like this approach to writing. It allows me to chunk sections. I got well into a new project when I discovered that the tool does not have the ability to create tables. I do a lot of technical writing and tables are essential. For regular prose, this is a great tool but without tables, this is not very useful for me. Probably the worst tool for writing I've ever come across. I fail to see what the developers thought they were offering that wasn't already provided in LibreOffice for free or Scrivener if you want to go paid.

Candy-floss graphics for writer It's tools, and most importantly longevity that we need. I'm coming straight at it. Ulysses just could be the most elegant, well-planned and best-realized way to write electronically to date. I want so much to buy it and live in it. I'll then gladly drink the kool-aid, straight, no chaser. Teksestro Mar 13 Saving everything you write into a single database might be useful for note-taking and scrapbook-style apps like Evernote, but not for a professional writing tool.

I don't want to see every note of every project I've ever written for in a gigantic database. I don't want to have to filter through dozens of projects, to find the current files for the project I want to work on. The "all your writing in one place" approach is a major fail - no matter how nice the program's interface might be. Gazman Dec 14 Ulysses is a great app for writing longer projects - not as bloated or cumbersome as Scrivener, more utilitarian than ByWord or it's ilk.

When I'm writing longer pieces I don't want my writing muddled with all the asterisks and other syntax, yet Ulysses forces me to have it.

The no longer developed Write has the best implementation of what I'm after, there it's called 'Rich MD', and other apps such as Typora which feature WYSIWYG markdown don't offer typewriter scrolling, which I consider an essential feature of a serious writing program. So, the search continues LuxLogica Nov 2 After reading several reviews online comparing Ulysses to Scrivener, I was eager to try it out.

Unfortunately, Ulysses is certainly not 'it'. Ulysses' interface is arguably the best thing about the program - modern, clean, sleek, you can tell a great deal of thought went into it - and it does make using the program's features rather intuitive. But unfortunately, that seems to be it's only point of difference. Ulysses does sport some nice 'advanced' features, not commonly found in they myriad of Markdown editors available for the Mac these days - such as having a word count target.

But these features are common to most word-processing and serious writing tools. But more disappointingly, it has some very severe shortcomings - at least for my use-case. It does not preview images in-line. It does not even allow you to select images using OS X's photo browser. Its support of Markdown is patchy - it uses its own 'version' of Markdown, which is not supported by any other software, so expect import issues if transferring your work.

But most disappointing of all is to see that the developers have chosen to build the program as a snippet utility: Ulysses stores ALL of your documents produced in it within a SINGLE library, which it manages.

Like other programs - TextNut, etc. This is touted by the developer as a 'feature', but it is the most glaring indication that it is a note-taking application, rather than a serious writing tool. Ulysses does have several filtering functions, that allow you to categorise and restrict the view of your documents, but that is basically forcing the user to jump through hoops to get the program to behave as if it were a document-based application which it isn't.

That "feature" alone means it's quite useless to me. I'm sadly disappointed at not being able to find a use for Ulysses in my writing toolbox. It does not have enough features to replace Scrivener as a writing-project manager, is not Markdown-compatible enough to replace a dedicated editor, and in the note-taking space there are more attractive and cheaper apps with better Markdown support - such as Write and TextNut.

I hope the developers will decide which direction they wish to take the software, and invest on fine-tuning its features to suit that market, just as they fine-tuned its beautiful interface. My way to go for writing. I wish a LaTex-Export. CDavid Aug 26 Ulysses is a great app for those who want to keep everything organised. Unlike most text editors, it lets search for particular part of your writing, edit what you've written previously with no effort at all.

Well, the price could have been a bit lower, but to be honest, the app is totally worth its price. Simon3 May 30 Excellent program! One big problem, considering I work with other MD and MMD applications, including Deckset, is that Ulysses' version of "extended" markdown does not follow what seems to be the main standard syntax MMD. This takes it out of my workflow except for some basic note-taking. Please add MMD support. David1 Apr 21 I've tinkered with many Markdown applications and have ultimately been dissatisfied with their shortcomings.

Finally tried the Ulysses 2 demo after reading about all the improvements in the new version. Best move I've made in a long time. Ulysses solves most of my difficulties with Markdown input and output. I still have Scrivener, and it has a niche place in my workflow. I still have Mellel, and it, in conjunction with TextSoap, is my regex workhorse.

But I now do most of my actual writing in Ulysses. People complain about the price of Ulysses. Scrivener and Mellel are about the same price. Nisus Writer Pro is more, and TextSoap which I use a lot in rehabilitating third party texts is not far behind. Price is usually commensurate with quality; irresponsible developers are, for the most part, easily recognizable.

People complain about developer use of the Mac App Store. For many developers, this route provides the best overall return for their labor. Responsible developers provide a demo download on their website and a discount when a major new version comes out.

The result is not much different from the traditional method. Bottom line: Of all the writing instruments I've looked into, tried, even bought, few of them even come close to Ulysses in either quality or utility.

These guys work hard to make a product that not only works well, but works the way I want it to. Ksrhee24 Apr 18 Version 2 is a fantastic update! Teksestro Oct 5 Ulysses' interface is nice, but that alone would not justify the price difference, even if both programs had equivalent feature lists.

Serious authors who deal,with lengthy, varied and complex projects will need the superior file and project management tools offered by programs such as "Scrivener".

Ulysses' approach of keeping all your texts from all your projects in a single database is nothing short of a nighmare, more suited to a note-taking application like Evernote than a serious writing tool. Xenophile Jun 21 Ulysses is of the more innovative markdown text editors I've tried. The GUI is clean and elegant, the themes are great, and the general layout is logical. I tweaked a theme in user preferences to create what for me produced the least eye strain of any app I've ever used on a Mac.

This fantastic writing environment is unmatched by any other app I've tried on a Mac, and I've been using Macs since the s. Unfortunately, there is no way to integrate Ulysses into my document storage organization.

Ulysses relies an on absurd storage scheme that buries it's document library in the user's hidden Home Library directory. Want to save a markdown document in a project folder in your Documents directory?

Want to back up that novel that's consumed the last 6 months of your life? Want to open a Ulysses document in another app? You're not competent to manage your own files, so F-you! What a disappointment. Maybe Ulysses IV will finally introduce the futuristic capability of saving files in any directory of the user's choice. Until then, there are other free markdown editors, and plenty of mature and refined writing apps Scrivener.

Rochade Apr 30 Tried the demo and have to say I am impressed. But for me the price is too high for an elegant writing app markdown composer. I would have instantly bought it if it was about half the price.

The best alternative for me is Write. Cojacoo Jan 20 This app is just great - especially in combination with Deadalus. I do all my writing in there - from notes to paper drafts. Once you have it, you start wondering, why it has no built in IDE and stuff before you come back, that there can hardly be one app alone serving any task But it goes a long way towards that.

Thanks Soulmen. Michael-Vilain Jan 19 Ulysses and Scrivner are about the same price. I wanted to replace my aging copy of Storymill with a tool that would give me equivalent features--chapters, scenes, research, character info, etc. All the writers I asked said "Scrivner" without hesitation.

Zx81 Jan 19 Another app that goes MAS only. I'll stick to U2 as long as it is possible. Shiny22 Jan 19 U3 is an entirely different app from the ones that went before. U3sits in a space somewhere between a Text Editor like BBEdit and comprehensive writing management system like Scrivener.

It's much closer to the Scrivener end of the space though. It allows you to create and manage complex writing projects, written in Markdown, to share and edit them with a partner app on iOS Daedalus and then output them to a variety the usual formats.

It doesn't have every bell and whistle that Scrivener has, but it is - to my eye at least - a better looking app and one that feels loose and unstructured whereas I find Scrivener always pushes me into a structure whether I'm ready or not. Of course, that's just me, and YMMV on that one.

I've found the app to be entirely stable, easy to use. I've not yet figured out a way to use a Citation app like Bookends with it - and perhaps I can't. So, for me, in an academic setting, U3 is for drafting and developing unto Draft 3 or thereabouts, and then over to something else for finishing. That might be a Word Processor for shorter pieces or into Scrivener for longer ones.

I enjoy using U3, which is a key quality in any software. This site needs a more sophisticated review system. The reviews under are not about the app so much as about the marketing, or the price On MAS this app has 47 x 5 stars as of my comment. Of course software rip off needs criticising, but I need to know about the app itself.

This thing is not half so revolutionary as the dev thinks Clueless that people are going to be ticked off when they spent way too much on previous version and struggled to learn and use For what? If anything, I want a refund for the ditched Ulysses II! Sadly my view reflects the pricing model. Having only purchased U2 in September and not being able to make us of the discount due to work commitments. My problem is developers that do not deem existing customers worth retaining.

Developers go on about the fact that upgrades are not available with MAS, then they shouldn't use it until Apple make this available. It's hardly a good idea to alienate your existing customer base. I have now switched to Scrivener as they do reward existing customers and not penalise them as Soulmen do. Lawrence-Goodman Apr 24 I don't know whether it's the App Store or Soulmen's fault, but it's ridiculous that those of us who bought Ulysses before should now have to pay full price for this.

I know it might be a complete rewrite, but many programs go through major rewrites, yet still offer discounts to previous users. The bottom line--it's about rewarding customer loyalty. Maclover Apr 13 Purchased the previous Ulysses from the AppStore about 6 months ago.. Mar Apr 6